Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
COMMAND Leaders dont create followers they create more leaders. T O M P E T E R S B U S I N E S S A U T H O R A N D S P E A K E R COMMAND HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICER A n important aspect of an organizational cancer prevention effort is developing the comprehensive accident injury illness and exposure policies and procedures as required by WAC 296-305-01501 and 01503. Such policies and procedures meet the dual needs of managing on-the-job injury processes as well as providing organizations with data that may prevent future events. In the context of cancer prevention it is desirable that an organizations policy and culture support precautionary reporting of exposure to carcinogens as a way to identify and mitigate hazards. Similar to near miss reporting precautionary reporting of exposure to carcinogens allows organizations to identify the root causes of the exposure and to design and implement corrective interventions. In developing policy that encourages precautionary reporting it is important to clearly define the parameters of the organizations reporting system. The Washington State Council of Fire Fighters Personal Injury Illness and Exposure Reporting System PIIERS allows members to record all incidents where there is the potential to have been exposed to the products of combustion. An organizational reporting system however should only be used when an exposure actually occurs. For example acting as a pump operator upwind of a large commercial fire may warrant a PIIERS report but may not warrant the filing of an organizational precautionary report. On the other hand if the wind shifts and the pump operator suddenly finds himself engulfed in acrid smoke then the member needs to fill out a PIIERS report as well as an internal report. These distinctions are clearly not black and white and must be supported by good policy along with a culture of mutual trust within an organization. From Labors perspective a robust organizational reporting system may reinforce the organizations commitment to transparency and safety. Labor must also recognize however that management may feel exposed to increased scrutiny if every routine fire call generated a wave of exposure reports. Because of this a collaborative effort between Labor and management can be undertaken to clearly define the formal and informal parameters of reporting policy. After all both groups 6